Will Star Trek See Vger Again
Did The Star Trek Movies Never Happen? Where Helm Kirk Is Now
Fan theories — they tin be incredibly fun, incredibly idea-provoking, and sometimes they're simply incredibly good evidence that just because a certain plant is legal in your state doesn't necessarily mean you should think besides hard while using it. At that place'due south a new Star Trek fan theory that has us scratching our heads well-nigh where it falls. Late terminal week, an aggressive Trek fan started getting a lot of attention with the theory that none of the original cast's movies after 1979's Star Trek: The Movement Film — everything between 1982's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and 1994's Star Trek: Generations — canonically took place. No, this is not an old fan arguing that they were bad movies. Instead, they debate that everything in those 6 films represented a simulation being experienced past Kirk.
How could this be? Well, the Reddit user YARNIA explains that, in fact, a expert deal of what we see in Star Trek: The Movement Moving picture doesn't happen. Instead of stopping V'Ger'southward destructive progress, the Enterprise and her crew are assimilated by Five'Ger at some point during the events of the flick and are kept in stasis. The end of the film is part of the simulation. YARNIA explains that Five'Ger yearns to understand lifeforms and has "unlimited processing ability" and and then information technology puts Kirk and co. through the simulation to improve understand them. For those familiar with the Star Trek: The Next Generation (TNG) episode Ship in a Canteen in which the malevolent holographic recreation of Professor Moriarty is made to believe he has escaped the Enterprise and gone on a never ending risk — when in fact he is stuck in a self-replicating simulation without knowing it — YARNIA explains it as being a similar idea.
Believe it or not, YARNIA raises some good points for their theory. They debate that the explanation given for the Enterprise's shields beingness able to withstand Five'Ger'due south energy cloud — the same deject that was able to destroy 3 Klingon ships and an entire Starfleet space station within seconds — just because of a shield upgrade, is pretty thin. They also indicate out what seems similar a huge inconsistency: that Dr. McCoy (DeForest Kelley) harshly criticizes Kirk for taking dorsum his command of the Enterprise in Star Trek: The Motion Motion picture, but later in Star Trek II passionately urges him to take back his command of the send. They say Kirk'south adventures "become more implausible" with each moving-picture show and that when he dies in Generations, it's actually because he's finally rejected the simulation. V'Ger, the theory says, knows that Kirk is rejecting the simulation and and then creates a simulation within a simulation — the Nexus of Generations — in order to stage Kirk'south death.
So, does YARNIA's theory make some interesting points? Absolutely. Is there any manner they're right? No, not remotely. And the reason why they can't possibly be right nearly their theory can be described in four words: Tea. Earl Grey. Hot.
In other words, this fan theory completely ignores its most glaring flaw — the beingness of Star Trek: The Next Generation and every other Star Trek film and series set up later on the events of the original cast's films. Offset of all, for the events of Generations to exist a simulation, then the events of the entire TNG series must too be a part of the same simulation, and we know that's not the instance. We know that's non the case because when Kirk enters the Nexus, he believes he'southward just left the Enterprise-B a century earlier, significant his (according to this theory) self-replicating simulation wouldn't have gotten equally far equally the 24th century, i.e. the era of TNG. Second of all, characters who accept likewise been assimilated by 5'Ger according to this theory — Spock (Leonard Nimoy), McCoy, and Scotty (James Doohan) — all announced in TNG long after the events of the commencement Star Trek movie. Third and finally, events of all the original cast Star Trek films are referenced in TNG, Deep Space Ix, Voyager, etc.
So no — while nosotros accept to give YARNIA high points for originality, the theory doesn't survive any better than a pile of loose latinum would survive in Quark'due south Bar. Of course, nosotros could be wrong. Information technology could be that Kirk's imagination produced the entire Trek franchise. But, come on. William Shatner coming up with that many stories that don't involve William Shatner? Who'due south going to buy that?
Source: https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/star-trek-movies-fan-theory.html
0 Response to "Will Star Trek See Vger Again"
Post a Comment